Menu

Archievs: ACCIDENT REVIEW
ACCIDENT REVIEW

accidentreview

A company which manufactured and installed windows has been fined £36,000 after carrying out work in the West End of London with no measures to prevent the workers falling eight metres and after dropping part of a window onto the public area below.

Westminster Magistrates’ Court heard that the company carried out window installation work that put their workers and members of the public at risk of suffering serious injuries or a fatality.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) carried out an investigation into the work after a member of the public provided photos of workers leaning out of window openings eight metres above the ground. They also provided a video showing the workers dropping part of a window which fell to the ground and just missed a nearby pedestrian.

The company had failed to provide equipment such as scaffolding which would have prevented the workers and window falling. None of the workers had received any formal training and no one was appointed to supervise the work.

The risks associated with the work had not been sufficiently assessed. The court heard the company had failed to invest in equipment for working at height and had a health and management system which relied entirely on the company’s managing director, despite his lack of relevant training and experience.

The work was halted when HSE served a Prohibition Notice. The court heard the company had previously been given advice by HSE in connection with work at height and that an audit by the company’s bank had previously identified a range of relevant health and safety failings. The court heard that neither written warning was heeded by the firm.

The company pleaded guilty to breaches of Regulation 6(3) and 10(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 and was fined £36,000 and ordered to pay £1,386 in costs.
Comment:
This case highlights the absolute requirement for all working at height activities to be properly assessed, planned and implemented, using the correct access equipment. It is vital that people are trained and competent, not only to undertake the practical work on site but also when planning working at height activities.

It is our experience, that in too many cases, safety method statements and risk assessments are poorly documented using ‘generic’ type documentation.

One other item to note is that a member of the public saw this activity and contacted the HSE. With modern communication equipment this is becoming a more common occurrence.

There really is no hiding place for substandard health & safety operations!  (Source: HSE)